Reminder: this box is £10 a month + £3.25 P+P.
First impressions:
First impressions:
I was one of many, many people who did not get the palette that they chose. I've been incredibly lucky to get the one I ended up with, considering the other options were pastel blues/pinks or bright glitters, but I was still really disappointed to see that it was a cool toned palette and not the warm toned one that I'd chosen. This was apparently due to a packing error and Glossybox have emailed those that were affected to tell them that they will be getting the palette that they chose in their September box by way of apology. So, I've got that to look forward to. In the meantime, I have the Hall of Fame palette - branded as "Boldly Bardot" in the choices list - to review instead.
The pochette I assume counts for one of the items in this bag as there are only four others, which is a bit disappointing. The Birchbag was at least a separate thing. I think it's weird how these boxes both seem to be sending me similar things whenever possible. Both sent bags this month, and both sent lip/cheek tints at the same time before. It can't be a coincidence. Still, the other four products in this box are nice to receive, even if the palette is not the one I wanted. I'm happy that there's finally some form of eyeshadow in one of these boxes, even if it's not the singles I was gunning for, and even happier that there's a face mask sample: I LOVE clay masks, and use them almost religiously to keep my skin as clear as I possibly can, so it was great to get one of those. A body lotion is a new thing too, and since I don't remember the last time I saw my Bodyshop face brush (I think I might have lost it when I moved, as I've looked everywhere. They don't seem to do them anymore unfortunately), I was really glad to get the Spa to You brush. All in all, another good mix of products. I know Spa to You and MUA from previous Glossyboxes but I haven't heard of Mudmasky or Cowshed before (or Rae Feather, I suppose), so there's a lot of new in here again.
Here's what I got this month!
3/5
Okay then, Glossybox. Who on earth would pay £20 for this? It's a little annoying that it's been included as one of our five products this month, but it definitely isn't worth £20! There's no way that I'd pay that much for it just because of the Rae Feather thing. I'm not like that about designer products. If I like a product, then I like it. Who designed it has nothing to do with that. I'm not going to like something just because it says it's designer and the designers that I generally like don't always make things that I like. Maybe there's something out there by Rae Feather that I'd love enough to warrant the price, but this bag isn't going to be it. I don't understand the fascination. Think of all the amazing products that you can buy for that amount of money. I'd rather get a liquid lipstick and some change than this. Having said all that... I still like it better than the Birchbag. It's just more practical. The Birchbag's shape makes it pretty inconvenient to use, the material means it's usually filthy, and it's small to boot. This doesn't have those issues. It has a nice wipe-clean lining and it's a really good size. The MUA palette fits inside easily and there's plenty of leftover space. You could easily fit your day's face in here. For keeping Glossybox makeup goodies together, it's fantastic, but the boxes do that just fine too. This is obviously more suited to travelling than the big bulky boxes are, but I have a million makeup bags already. So I don't really know how I feel about this. I don't agree that it's worth £20 or even close, and I don't like that I got this in the box instead of something else that I would get more use out of, especially since I didn't get a hair product this month. But it's not a bad makeup bag. It does the job and it does it much better than the Birchbag does. I just don't think it was really necessary. I don't even think that it's available now that the box has been and gone, so I don't know why they've put a price on something that nobody can buy anymore anyway.
Okay then, Glossybox. Who on earth would pay £20 for this? It's a little annoying that it's been included as one of our five products this month, but it definitely isn't worth £20! There's no way that I'd pay that much for it just because of the Rae Feather thing. I'm not like that about designer products. If I like a product, then I like it. Who designed it has nothing to do with that. I'm not going to like something just because it says it's designer and the designers that I generally like don't always make things that I like. Maybe there's something out there by Rae Feather that I'd love enough to warrant the price, but this bag isn't going to be it. I don't understand the fascination. Think of all the amazing products that you can buy for that amount of money. I'd rather get a liquid lipstick and some change than this. Having said all that... I still like it better than the Birchbag. It's just more practical. The Birchbag's shape makes it pretty inconvenient to use, the material means it's usually filthy, and it's small to boot. This doesn't have those issues. It has a nice wipe-clean lining and it's a really good size. The MUA palette fits inside easily and there's plenty of leftover space. You could easily fit your day's face in here. For keeping Glossybox makeup goodies together, it's fantastic, but the boxes do that just fine too. This is obviously more suited to travelling than the big bulky boxes are, but I have a million makeup bags already. So I don't really know how I feel about this. I don't agree that it's worth £20 or even close, and I don't like that I got this in the box instead of something else that I would get more use out of, especially since I didn't get a hair product this month. But it's not a bad makeup bag. It does the job and it does it much better than the Birchbag does. I just don't think it was really necessary. I don't even think that it's available now that the box has been and gone, so I don't know why they've put a price on something that nobody can buy anymore anyway.
2) MUA Eyeshadow Palette in Hall of Fame - RRP £4
4/5
This is going to be a really long review I think! It bugs me when shadow names are on the underside of the palette because I find myself constantly turning the palette over to see what I'm using, so for reference, top row L-R: Rose Ash, Bare, Lion, Reveal, Tectonite and Hydra. Bottom row L-R: Shy, Catacomb, Chino, Hustle, Cool Grey and Titan. There's no mirror but I find it really awkward using palette mirrors anyway (must be an eyesight thing) and I always use a different one, so I didn't care about that. I actually really like the little window because I can look at the shadows and see whether I feel like using that palette today without having to bother opening it. The double ended sponge in the palette is a bit unfortunate - I'm not against sponges, but having a double ended one seems like a waste of space. A fluffy brush for blending on one end and a sponge for packing on colour on the other end would be so much better.
This is going to be a really long review I think! It bugs me when shadow names are on the underside of the palette because I find myself constantly turning the palette over to see what I'm using, so for reference, top row L-R: Rose Ash, Bare, Lion, Reveal, Tectonite and Hydra. Bottom row L-R: Shy, Catacomb, Chino, Hustle, Cool Grey and Titan. There's no mirror but I find it really awkward using palette mirrors anyway (must be an eyesight thing) and I always use a different one, so I didn't care about that. I actually really like the little window because I can look at the shadows and see whether I feel like using that palette today without having to bother opening it. The double ended sponge in the palette is a bit unfortunate - I'm not against sponges, but having a double ended one seems like a waste of space. A fluffy brush for blending on one end and a sponge for packing on colour on the other end would be so much better.
Like I said, of the four palettes available to get in this box, if I'm going to get one that isn't what I chose then I got lucky considering the other palettes on offer. I opted to try the mattes in this first, before I even did swatches on my arm, and I was really disappointed with them. They did hold up for a good few hours before creasing, I think, but they were barely visible on my lids until that happened. You can see which ones they are on the swatches quite clearly: they barely have any pigment and are chalky/chunky (2 "Bare" and 9 "Chino"). The swatches were done with one finger swipe in the pan and one finger swipe on my arm.
I like that there's two different ones so you can mix and match to make your own crease shade, skintone-wise, but I couldn't get either colour to show up on my eyelids. I wish MUA had put a bit more effort into them. If you've only got two matte shadows in your palette, make sure they're useful. Since I decided to completely ignore those shades, I've gotten along with the palette much better. There's a lot in here to like, especially considering the price. I was going through my palettes, realising that I didn't have any affordable palettes to compare it to, when I realised that there were plenty of similarities with my high-end palettes, so I decided to do some comparison swatches.
Hopefully the picture is fairly self-explanatory (click to see a larger version). Some are pretty close, some are a bit different, some are exact. I didn't get a comparison for all of them, but these were the MUA shadows that I was most impressed with. Let me know if you want me to dig around for comparisons for the rest of the shadows in the palette. Here's what I got though, and it really didn't take very long to match them up either.
1 - UD's Dust (from Naked 3 palette) VS MUA's Rose Ash: Dust is more pigmented and perhaps a little more shimmery, but they're very similar otherwise.
2 - UD's Half Baked (Naked 1 and 2, but I swatched it from Naked 1) VS MUA's Lion: these look different in the photo but they looked exact on my arm, so I'd say these are matches. Half Baked is maybe a bit brighter and more pigmented, but not by much. I couldn't tell the difference when they were on my eyes.
3 - UD's Gunmetal (Naked 1) VS MUA's Cool Grey: this is the only really noticeable difference in the comparisons. Gunmetal was darker. Same sparkle though, and I assume it's meant to be used in the same way. Cool Grey can always be darkened with a bit of Titan.
4 - UD's Creep (Naked 1) VS MUA's Titan: these are pretty exact, right down to the subtle sparkles. Pigmentation was very similar but Creep was a little smoother.
5 - UD's Hustle (Naked 1) VS MUA's Hustle: these are exact matches, even down to their name. On my arm I couldn't tell the difference, in the photo I can't tell the difference either. If I'd done this one first it might have confused me over which side was which.
6 - UD's Sin (Naked 1) VS MUA's Catacomb: Sin is slightly more pink than Catacomb and a bit more pigmented, but these two are very close. I did a comparison later with High from the UD Smoky palette and that one is exact: High was just a bit more shimmery than Catacomb was. I wasn't paying much attention to the Smoky palette when I was looking for comparisons for some reason!
Unfortunately, MUA don't seem to sell any of the shadows from this palette as singles, but since the whole palette is only £4, it hardly matters. The mattes aren't great, but the shimmers are so good that they almost make up for it. As long as you have another shadow to use as a transition shade, the mattes being bad in this palette won't matter. The hits in this palette are fantastic shadows and I'm having a lot of fun playing with them. The fact that they stood up so well to Urban Decay, when those shadow palettes are £38.50, is pretty amazing. I didn't test the shadows with a primer as I still haven't found one that isn't a creased mess way before eyeshadow normally would be without, but the MUA shadows didn't last on me as long as the Urban Decay shadows do. I used Lion and Half Baked against each other and the eye with Half Baked looked good for much longer. Still, the MUA shadows I've tried have all lasted a good five hours or so and there are plenty of times when that's all I need. I was actually really impressed with that five hours, too: they survived oily skin in a heatwave and even when they started to crease they still looked really vibrant. For someone without oily skin, it's probably fine. It's actually opened my eyes up a bit to more affordable brand eyeshadows. I haven't tried any for over a decade now because they just didn't work that well on my skin, and I would rather spend the extra money and get high end shadows that lasted instead. I have 12 high end palettes now and a small selection of single shades and I use them all the time, but it never occurred to me to try a more affordable brand since back when I tried them before, they were really disappointing. Things have clearly changed! I can't give it full marks because those mattes just aren't really there, but I fell in love with this palette, I fell in love with the price and now I'm really excited about getting the palette that I chose in September!
3) Mudmasky Facial Detox Purifying Recovery Mask 20ml/0.7fl. oz - full size RRP £53 (the Mudmasky website says it's £59 though, so not sure where Glossybox got £53 from)
4/5
The packaging for this includes a time for how long to leave the mask on depending on your skin type, which I thought was really helpful. I've never seen that before on a face mask and I think it's really good that they recognise that people with different skin types will be using this product. At first, once the mask was applied there was the usual itch/sting (usual for clay masks in my experience, anyway) but it wasn't long before that was replaced with something new: pulsing. I was very, very aware of every millimetre of skin on my face under this mask. It's a very weird feeling. It didn't hurt, but it felt like it was tightening and actually changing my skin. This sensation outlived any unpleasant itching and it was definitely more comfortable than some other clay masks that I've tried. The recommended time for oily skin was 11 minutes, and after this time the mask was mostly dry. There were a few dark patches still, but they contained the weird flotsam and jetsam that the formula has in it. It's not a smooth mask, it has little leafy bits in it. They reminded me of pieces of seaweed, which I hate touching, so applying this mask was a bit disgusting. I think they're actually the camellia sinensis leaves that are listed in the ingredients description, but they don't feel particularly nice either way. Also listed in the description was parfum. I have no idea why a mask that is expensive as this one is (I think I dumped £5-10's worth on my face) contains perfume. It's not tested on animals, is paraben free and contains natural ingredients, and then there's that parfum. I'm sure it serves a purpose, I just don't understand what that purpose is. Maybe the natural ingredients smell too disgusting for people to tolerate them on their face for 11 minutes without something to mask it. Who knows.
The packaging for this includes a time for how long to leave the mask on depending on your skin type, which I thought was really helpful. I've never seen that before on a face mask and I think it's really good that they recognise that people with different skin types will be using this product. At first, once the mask was applied there was the usual itch/sting (usual for clay masks in my experience, anyway) but it wasn't long before that was replaced with something new: pulsing. I was very, very aware of every millimetre of skin on my face under this mask. It's a very weird feeling. It didn't hurt, but it felt like it was tightening and actually changing my skin. This sensation outlived any unpleasant itching and it was definitely more comfortable than some other clay masks that I've tried. The recommended time for oily skin was 11 minutes, and after this time the mask was mostly dry. There were a few dark patches still, but they contained the weird flotsam and jetsam that the formula has in it. It's not a smooth mask, it has little leafy bits in it. They reminded me of pieces of seaweed, which I hate touching, so applying this mask was a bit disgusting. I think they're actually the camellia sinensis leaves that are listed in the ingredients description, but they don't feel particularly nice either way. Also listed in the description was parfum. I have no idea why a mask that is expensive as this one is (I think I dumped £5-10's worth on my face) contains perfume. It's not tested on animals, is paraben free and contains natural ingredients, and then there's that parfum. I'm sure it serves a purpose, I just don't understand what that purpose is. Maybe the natural ingredients smell too disgusting for people to tolerate them on their face for 11 minutes without something to mask it. Who knows.
This is quite messy to remove. The leaves in the formula will stick to your face and get tangled in any hair they come into contact with and they make the removal so much harder than it otherwise would be, so I hope they do a world of good for the skin to make up for it. It specifies to remove with cold water, which I don't recall seeing in instructions before. Usually it's warm water so I have to remove it in the shower, but this mask likes the cold apparently. I'm glad I used it before a shower anyway though, because even after removing it and drying my face, I still had pieces of leaf stuck to my skin. Sort of worth it, however: my skin is definitely feeling and looking tighter. It feels the cleanest it's felt for a long time and it is noticeably clearer. I was also able to tell a difference with oil production. As I mentioned in a previous review, this could just be a by-product of hot water on my skin, but usually after removing masks like this my skin gets oily again rather quickly, whereas with this one it didn't do that. I was impressed with the initial use and then impressed again when I tried it again. It's definitely better than the clay mask I was using before, but it's also ten times the price. The second time, I used a lot less product, so maybe it could be stretched out to last longer - it does say to use a thin layer - but it also involves washing clay down the sink, and I'm not sure of the longterm effect that that would have on the plumbing here. I have a tub of Indian healing clay and some organic apple cider vinegar to use for a face mask on the way, and I know that you can dampen that once it has dried and then peel it off rather than washing it down the sink each time. I'm definitely going to keep this one in mind, though. It did make my skin feel and look really, really nice after I'd used it. It was put in our boxes this month to mark the launch of the product in the UK, so I'm hoping that it'll be a lot easier to get hold of than some of the other things I've had in these boxes when this sample runs out. When questioned about the high price, the brand replied that you will end up saving money because you won't need to buy as much make up. I don't know about that for me - I don't wear that much makeup on my face at the moment anyway, but that's a pretty huge claim for a company to make. Still, it was very nice. I'll definitely be keeping this on my radar for a luxury skin treat in the future.
4) Spa to You Deep Pore Cleansing Brush - RRP 6.99
4/5
As I said, my trusty Bodyshop face brush has disappeared off the edge of the planet and isn't sold anymore. I was actually eyeing up the Soap and Glory brush to replace it with, but then this came along. I love the handle. It's very easy to hold and maneuver and it also feels strong and very well made. I don't see myself snapping this anytime soon. It comes with a plastic case to protect the bristles for travelling or when it isn't in use, which is fantastic. It's easy to clip on, easy to remove, and does the job perfectly. The silicone bristles give a really nice massage for improved circulation, too. The only complaint I'd have is that I don't think the bristles are quite as soft as they make them out to be. It can be quite harsh on the face. I have to use this much more gently than I had to with the Bodyshop brush as it can be a bit much for my skin in places. But it's still a great face brush and I use it all the time. After this and the konjac sponge, this brand is definitely on my watch list now.
5) Cowshed Wild Cow Invigorating Body Lotion 30ml/1fl. oz - full size RRP £20
5/5
This was a lot thicker than I was expecting it to be! Since it says it's a lotion I was expecting a much thinner consistency than this. I think I might struggle to get all of this sample out and used. The full size is 300ml and packaged in just a larger version of this, so I'm not sure how that's going to work. I had to shake it to get product out for my first use. That said, I really, really liked this. Even though it was thick, a little went a long way. It smells amazing, but not too overpowering or choking. It isn't greasy on the skin, it sinks in really well and the absolute best part was that I didn't need to wash my hands after applying it before I could do anything else. It's not necessary to do that with this. I don't think I've ever had a body lotion be like that before - I always have to wash my hands after I've used something like this, either because of the smell on my hands or the sliminess. All this did was moisturise my hands as well. So it might be a bit difficult to get product out when it's been used quite a bit, but I'm certainly going to try anyway.
This was a lot thicker than I was expecting it to be! Since it says it's a lotion I was expecting a much thinner consistency than this. I think I might struggle to get all of this sample out and used. The full size is 300ml and packaged in just a larger version of this, so I'm not sure how that's going to work. I had to shake it to get product out for my first use. That said, I really, really liked this. Even though it was thick, a little went a long way. It smells amazing, but not too overpowering or choking. It isn't greasy on the skin, it sinks in really well and the absolute best part was that I didn't need to wash my hands after applying it before I could do anything else. It's not necessary to do that with this. I don't think I've ever had a body lotion be like that before - I always have to wash my hands after I've used something like this, either because of the smell on my hands or the sliminess. All this did was moisturise my hands as well. So it might be a bit difficult to get product out when it's been used quite a bit, but I'm certainly going to try anyway.
Overall Impression:
This was a really good box this month. Even with the makeup bag, I still got my money's worth from this. I know that they made a pretty huge mistake with the eyeshadow palette choices but the correction was made very quickly. They responded to my email quickly and sent out a mass email with the resolution almost as soon as the problem came to light. I was really impressed at how fast they handled that. There was none of this "3-5 business days for a response" crap. I will still be getting the palette I chose and in the meantime I have another palette now that's really nice. I would never, ever have chosen this palette with these colours but it ended up being very similar to things I already have and love. I've used it so much since I got it. Win/win.
I use the face brush pretty much every day, I use the lotion when my skin is feeling extra dry (now that the seasons are changing, I'm going to actually have to bother moisturising my skin sometimes unless I want to shed it all like a snake) and I've almost used the mask up. This is another box from Glossybox where a lot of the products have made it into my routine. It's a little different this month since two of them were sample sizes - I don't remember having more than one sample size in a previous box - but they were still decent sizes and I got a good idea of what the products were like from them. With the exception of the makeup bag (I'm just trying to pretend that the makeup bags from Birchbox and Glossybox this month didn't happen), these are all products that I would buy in future and continue to use, so that's great. Glossybox are definitely improving since my first few boxes. I would still much rather have had a haircare product in place of the Thing That Shall Not Be Named, but it does feel like they're working on variety. I got a beauty tool, skincare, body care and makeup and they're all perfectly usable.
I use the face brush pretty much every day, I use the lotion when my skin is feeling extra dry (now that the seasons are changing, I'm going to actually have to bother moisturising my skin sometimes unless I want to shed it all like a snake) and I've almost used the mask up. This is another box from Glossybox where a lot of the products have made it into my routine. It's a little different this month since two of them were sample sizes - I don't remember having more than one sample size in a previous box - but they were still decent sizes and I got a good idea of what the products were like from them. With the exception of the makeup bag (I'm just trying to pretend that the makeup bags from Birchbox and Glossybox this month didn't happen), these are all products that I would buy in future and continue to use, so that's great. Glossybox are definitely improving since my first few boxes. I would still much rather have had a haircare product in place of the Thing That Shall Not Be Named, but it does feel like they're working on variety. I got a beauty tool, skincare, body care and makeup and they're all perfectly usable.
Box average: 4/5
Cumulative box average: 4/5
The spoiler for September's box is amazing - Too Faced Better Than Sex mascara! It looks like a sample mascara, not the full size, but I don't care! There's a picture of both the regular and the waterproof and I have no idea what I'm getting. There's been no email sent around so we can choose and even if there was, I honestly wouldn't know what to go for. But I've never tried that mascara and I've wanted to for ages now, but was put off buying it in case I tried it and hated it, so it's great that I'll be getting one to try in my box!